<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journal Paper Archives - Prem Nichani</title>
	<atom:link href="https://premnichani.ca/pubtype/journal-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubtype/journal-paper/</link>
	<description>PGY1 Ophthalmology Resident</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 03:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021</link>
					<comments>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 04:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Please contact Prem Nichani for a copy of the Abstract as it is not officially accepted by nor published [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/">Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p>Please contact Prem Nichani for a copy of the Abstract as it is not officially accepted by nor published in a scholarly journal. Currently under review at <em>Ophthalmology Retina</em>.</p>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span class="s2"><span class="s2"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Popovic MM</span>, <strong>Nichani P,</strong> Dhoot AS, Pathak A, Muni RH, Kertes PJ. (2021). Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</span></span><span class="s2">. UofT Department of Ophthalmology &amp; Vision Sciences 62nd Research Day, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ePoster)</span><span class="s2">.</span> View presentation, references, and conflicts of interest here.</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/">Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third nerve palsy due to influenza A infection</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/third-nerve-palsy-after-influenza-a-2021/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=third-nerve-palsy-after-influenza-a-2021</link>
					<comments>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/third-nerve-palsy-after-influenza-a-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/third-nerve-palsy-after-influenza-a-2021/">Third nerve palsy due to influenza A infection</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/third-nerve-palsy-after-influenza-a-2021/">Third nerve palsy due to influenza A infection</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/third-nerve-palsy-after-influenza-a-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance coverage in Ontario: A repeated population-based cross-sectional study using survey data</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/prescription-eyewear-insurance-2021/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=prescription-eyewear-insurance-2021</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 23:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Background: Insurance coverage may reduce cost barriers to obtain vision correction. We determined the frequency and source of prescription [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/prescription-eyewear-insurance-2021/">The frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance coverage in Ontario: A repeated population-based cross-sectional study using survey data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p><strong>Background:</strong> Insurance coverage may reduce cost barriers to obtain vision correction. We determined the frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance to understand how Canadians finance optical correction.</p>
<p><strong>Methods:</strong> Insurance data from Ontario respondents to the Canadian Community Health Survey in 2003, 2005, and 2013/14 was analyzed. Unadjusted proportions and adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) of having insurance were compared.</p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong> Insurance covered all or part of the costs of prescription eyewear for 62% of Ontarians in all survey years (n=42,777 in 2003, 41,766 in 2005, and 42,553 in 2013/2014). Among those insured, 84-86% had employer-sponsored coverage, 9-10% from government-sponsorship, and 6-7% via private plans. In 2005 and 2013/14, employer-sponsored coverage remained at 87% for individuals in households with post-secondary graduation, but decreased significantly for those in households without secondary school graduation, from 67.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.2-70.8%, 175,000 individuals) in 2005 to 54.6% (95% CI 50.1-59.2%, 123,500 individuals) in 2013/14. Government-sponsored coverage increased significantly for individuals in households without secondary school graduation, from 29.2% (95% CI 26-33%, 76,400 individuals) in 2005 to 41.7% (95% CI 37-46%, 93,900 individuals) in 2013/14. Ontarians in households without secondary school graduation (versus those with) were less likely to report employer-sponsored coverage (APR 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.84), but more likely to have government-sponsored coverage (APR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06-1.53).</p>
<p><strong>Interpretation:</strong> 62% of Ontarians had prescription eyewear insurance. The largest source of insurance was employer-sponsored, primarily covering those with higher levels of education. In recent years, government-sponsored insurance increased significantly among less-educated individuals.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/prescription-eyewear-insurance-2021/">The frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance coverage in Ontario: A repeated population-based cross-sectional study using survey data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A review of 3476 eyes</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/migs-review-3476-eyes-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=migs-review-3476-eyes-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a potentially safer and more efficacious method studied in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/migs-review-3476-eyes-2020/">Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A review of 3476 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="enc-abstract" class="abstract-content selected">
<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p>Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a potentially safer and more efficacious method studied in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) requiring less invasive treatment goals; however, the literature on MIGS must be thoroughly evaluated. We conducted a review of MIGS by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Primary efficacy indicators were reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) and topical medication use postoperatively. While all comparative randomized controlled trials assessing MIGS in English peer-reviewed journals were included, only observational studies with a target follow-up of at least one year and a high priority score were analyzed, resulting in a total of 3476 eyes across 20 trials. The mean age was 69.5 ± 2.9, 53.7% were female, and 77.4% were Caucasian. One study had last follow-up at less than one year, fifteen studies had follow-up extending 1-2 years, and four had longer than two years of follow-up. A pattern of more significant IOP and medication reduction was observed in MIGS patients (n=2170) relative to control (n=1306) interventions. iStent had the most literature supporting its efficacy, followed by Hydrus. The most common adverse events following MIGS implantation included stent obstruction, inflammation, and subsequent surgical intervention. Surgical complication rates and efficacy are favorable following MIGS. This review helps to consolidate the high-quality evidence that exists for various MIGS procedures and to identify gaps where further research is needed.</p>
</div>
<p><strong class="sub-title">Keywords: </strong>IOP reduction; MIGS; filtration surgery; glaucoma surgery; ocular drainage implant; open-angle glaucoma.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/migs-review-3476-eyes-2020/">Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A review of 3476 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interview with John Yip, CEO of Kensington Health</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/john-yip-covid-kensington-health-interview-2021/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=john-yip-covid-kensington-health-interview-2021</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract John Yip, a highly respected leader in ophthalmology and community health, is the CEO of Kensington Health in Toronto, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/john-yip-covid-kensington-health-interview-2021/">Redefining leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interview with John Yip, CEO of Kensington Health</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p>John Yip, a highly respected leader in ophthalmology and community health, is the CEO of Kensington Health in Toronto, Canada. He accrued his reputation as a leader in previous roles as the Vice-President of Corporate Services for Health Quality Ontario, a managing consultant for GCI, the IT and business consulting services giant, a senior consultant at Pricewaterhousecoopers Consulting, and a consultant at KPMG. John has made significant strides in health, reducing cataract surgery operating room turnover times from 30 minutes down to a mere seven which is integral when such a procedure has a waitlist of over a year amidst a rapidly aging population. His experiences, insights, and achievements are profoundly influential, not just for other current and future CEOs in healthcare but also for any front-line worker who is willing and dedicated to making an impact during this unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic. There is much to learn from John in terms of leading a revolution to transform and innovate within our healthcare system for the better.</p>
<p>This brief COVID-19-focused leadership interview with John can be summarized into the following key points: (1) Rather than looking to ‘innovate’ and radically change healthcare, look at the triumphs and failures of the past. Often, there is much to learn and improve with little to no additional resources in a way that can significantly ameliorate the care we provide; (2) Three qualities every leader should possess are courage, integrity, and selflessness; (3) Introspection is a crucial part of success. Take the time to reflect on the past and present so you can create sustainable goals for the future without burning out; and (4) Believe in yourself and work hard no matter how difficult it may be because it will always get better, no matter what happens.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/john-yip-covid-kensington-health-interview-2021/">Redefining leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interview with John Yip, CEO of Kensington Health</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rop-lpc-ivi-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rop-lpc-ivi-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract We investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rop-lpc-ivi-2020/">Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<section>
<div class="section-paragraph">
<div>
<p>We investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation (LPC) for retinopathy of prematurity. We performed a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL (2005–2019). Comparative studies reporting on ocular efficacy and/or safety outcomes after IVIs and LPC for retinopathy of prematurity were included. The primary outcome was the regression rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the likelihood of requiring additional treatment, visual and refractive outcomes, and complications. Overall, 777 publications were identified. Twenty-four articles were included, with 1,289 eyes receiving IVI and 2,412 eyes undergoing LPC. There was no significant difference in the regression rate between IVI and LPC (P = 0.68); however, eyes that underwent IVI were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of requiring additional treatment (risk ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.26, 3.73], P = 0.005) and longer time from treatment to retreatment or recurrence (weighted mean difference = 6.43 weeks, 95% CI = [2.36, 10.51], P = 0.002). Eyes receiving IVI required surgical intervention significantly less often (risk ratio = 0.45, 95% CI = [0.23, 0.89], P = 0.02). Astigmatism was significantly lower after IVI relative to LPC (weighted mean difference = −0.25 D, 95% CI = [−0.45, −0.06], P = 0.01), and there was a lower proportion of emmetropic eyes at last follow-up after LPC (risk ratio = 0.51, 95% CI = [0.27, 0.99], P = 0.05). There were no differences in visual and safety outcomes between IVI and LPC. LPC had a lower likelihood of requiring additional treatment, whereas IVIs were associated with a longer interval from treatment to retreatment or recurrence, reduced risk of surgical intervention and superior refractive outcomes. All other outcomes were comparable between IVIs and LPC.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords: </strong>retinopathy of prematurity; bevacizumab; ranibizumab; lasers; laser therapy</p>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1"><b>Nichani P</b></span></span><span class="s2">, Popovic MM, Muni RH, Mireskandari K, Tehrani NN, Kertes PJ. (2020). Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Las Vegas, NV, United States (ePoster). </span><span class="s3">Spotlighted by <i><a href="https://www.ophthalmologyadvisor.com/meetings/aao-2020/researchers-compare-laser-photocoagulation-injections-for-rop/">OphthalmologyAdvisor.com</a> </i>and<i><a href="https://www.practiceupdate.com/content/aao-2020-meta-analysis-compares-risksbenefits-of-laser-photocoagulation-versus-intravitreal-injections-for-retinopathy-of-prematurity/110009" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> PracticeUpdate.com</a>. </i></span><a href="https://aao.scientificposters.com/index.cfm?k=swsxpzuyfe">View ePoster with narration here</a>.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s3">Popovic MM</span></span><span class="s2">, </span><span class="s4"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">, Muni RH, Mireskandari K, Tehrani NN, Kertes PJ. (2020). Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes. European Society of Retina Specialists EURetina, Virtual Meeting (oral).</span> <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yaWZ0nvKBVBqvcRHwczR7XFjSywogaHR/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View presentation here</a>.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s3">Popovic MM</span></span><span class="s2">, </span><span class="s4"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">, Muni RH, Mireskandari K, Tehrani NN, Kertes PJ. (2020). Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes. UofT Department of Ophthalmology &amp; Vision Sciences 62nd Research Day, Toronto, ON (oral). </span><span class="s3"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Alumni Award for Best Resident Research Presentation</span>.</span> <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MCnxpSGUf3gv6Sk77KuOZ8YGjOWODHCE/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View presentation here</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rop-lpc-ivi-2020/">Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vision loss from giant cell arteritis in patients with other ocular diagnoses</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-other-ocular-diagnoses-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gca-other-ocular-diagnoses-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 07:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Vision problems from giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be difficult to diagnose as patients may present with vision loss [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-other-ocular-diagnoses-2020/">Vision loss from giant cell arteritis in patients with other ocular diagnoses</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p>Vision problems from giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be difficult to diagnose as patients may present with vision loss in the absence of systemic symptoms, have other comorbidities that affect inflammatory blood markers, or have other ocular diagnoses. We present 3 cases illustrating this point including a patient with advanced glaucoma with worsening vision from posterior ischemic optic neuropathy from GCA, a patient with arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION) erroneously diagnosed as optic neuritis without elevated inflammatory blood markers due to corticosteroid use, and a patient with AAION and a history of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in her fellow eye and untreated obstructive sleep apnea. GCA should be kept in the differential diagnosis for patients over 50 years of age even if they carry other ocular diagnoses. Temporal artery biopsy remains the gold standard for GCA diagnosis and is often required in equivocal cases.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-other-ocular-diagnoses-2020/">Vision loss from giant cell arteritis in patients with other ocular diagnoses</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peripapillary haloes associated with optic disc drusen</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/peripapillary-haloes-optic-disc-drusen-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=peripapillary-haloes-optic-disc-drusen-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 07:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A 21-year-old woman was referred for possible papilledema after a routine examination. She had a visual acuity of 20/20 OU, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/peripapillary-haloes-optic-disc-drusen-2020/">Peripapillary haloes associated with optic disc drusen</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 21-year-old woman was referred for possible papilledema after a routine examination. She had a visual acuity of 20/20 OU, normal Humphrey visual fields, and normal color vision. A dilated examination revealed elevated optic nerve heads with significant surrounding peripapillary opaque haloes, without hyperemia or obscuration of the retinal vasculature, suggesting pseudopapilledema. Optic disc drusen were visible on the nasal portion of the optic disc in the left eye on fundus photography and both eyes with fundus autofluorescence and enhanced-depth imaging–optical coherence tomography. Enhanced-depth imaging–optical coherence tomography of the optic disc also demonstrated peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid masslike structures with small hyperreflective dots. A review of old records indicated that these fundus changes had been present 10 years prior to presentation. Peripapillary changes associated with optic disc drusen can be impressive and extensive, but the absence of optic disc hyperemia, stability over time, and use of optic nerve imaging can help in differentiating it from true papilledema.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/peripapillary-haloes-optic-disc-drusen-2020/">Peripapillary haloes associated with optic disc drusen</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 03:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Topic: The role of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of ocular pain after intravitreal injections (IVIs) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020/">Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="abssec0010">
<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p id="abspara0010"><strong>Topic:</strong> The role of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of ocular pain after intravitreal injections (IVIs) has been explored. To provide clarity on the evidence for these agents, the present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0015">
<p id="abspara0015"><strong>Clinical Relevance:</strong> No standard of care regimen exists for the management of pain resulting from IVIs.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0020">
<p id="abspara0020"><strong>Methods:</strong> A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central from inception through July 2019. The RCTs that treated patients with a topical NSAID and assessed postprocedural pain were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane guidelines. For all analyses, weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Random effects models were used for all analyses. The primary analysis analyzed pain on a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale. Literature estimates were categorized into the following postprocedure time point groups: 1 hour or less, 1 to 24 hours (although data were available only at 6 hours), and 24 hours or more. A subgroup analysis stratified studies based on agent and preprocedure versus postprocedure administration.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0025">
<p id="abspara0025"><strong>Results:</strong> From 241 results, 9 RCTs and 598 eyes were included. A low to medium risk of bias was found across the included studies. The mean pain score on a 0-to-10 visual analog scale was significantly lower after topical NSAID administration relative to control at 1 hour or less after IVI (WMD, –1.01 units; 95% CI, –1.38 to –0.65; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), 6 hours after IVI (WMD, –2.17 units; 95% CI, –2.67 to –1.68; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; threshold met for clinical significance, defined as WMD &gt;1.2 units), and more than 24 hours after IVI (WMD, –0.75 units; 95% CI, –1.11 to –0.38; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). A greater effect size was seen with administration of NSAIDs before versus after IVI, as well as topical nepafenac relative to ketorolac or diclofenac.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0030">
<p id="abspara0030"><strong>Discussion:</strong> At 6 hours after the procedure, NSAIDs provide a clinically meaningful reduction in pain relative to a control group. The administration of NSAIDs before the procedure, specifically topical nepafenac, was associated with the greatest improvement in pain relative to the control group.</p>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
</div>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1">Popovic MM</span></span><span class="s2">, Muni RH, </span><span class="s3"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">, Kertes PJ. (Oct 2020). Topical non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis. European Society of Retina Specialists EURetina, Virtual Meeting (ePoster). <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rsl6oob2nTSQglJHh21bsD1przPvN9xy/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View ePoster here</a>.</span></li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020/">Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 03:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Presentations Micieli JA, Nichani P. (2020). Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020/">Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span class="s1">Micieli JA</span><span class="s2">, </span><span class="s3"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">. (2020). Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination. Canadian Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting &amp; Exhibition, Vancouver, BC (ePoster).</span></li>
</ol>
<h1>Notes</h1>
<p>COS2020 Reference List:</p>
<ol>
<li class="p1"><span class="s1">Hoffman GS. Giant cell arteritis. Ann Int Med. 2016;165:ITC65-80.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Giant-cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. N Engl J Med. 2014;37:50–7.</span></li>
<li class="p1"><span class="s1">Devaraj NK. Giant cell arteritis: where did we go wrong? Fortune J Rheumatol. 2019;1:12-4.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Weyand CM, Liao YJ, Goronzy JJ. The immunopathology of giant cell arteritis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012;32:259–265.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Helweg-Larsen J, Tarp B, Obel N, Baslund B. No evidence of parvovirus B19, Chlamydia pneumoniae or human herpes virus infection in temporal artery biopsies in patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2002;41:445–9.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Ing EB, Ing R, Liu X, Zhang A, Torun N, et al. Does herpes zoster predispose to giant cell arteritis: a geo-epidemiologic study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:113–118.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Lotan I, Steiner I. Giant cell arteritis following varicella zoster vaccination. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:158–9.</span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Gilden D, White T, Khmeleva N, Heintzman A, Choe A, et al.</span> <span class="s1">Prevalence and distribution of VZV in temporal arteries of patients with giant cell arteritis. Neurology. 2015;85:1914–5.</span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Nagel MA, White T, Khmeleva N, Rempel A, Boyer PJ, et al. Analysis of varicella-zoster virus in temporal arteries biopsy positive and negative for giant cell arteritis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1281–7. </span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Perez C, Loza E, Tinture T. Giant cell arteritis after influenza vaccination. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2677. </span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N. “ASIA”—autoimmune/ inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. J Autoimmun. 2011;36:4–8. </span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Torisu Y, Horai Y, Michitsuji T, Kawahara C, Mori T, et al. Giant cell arteritis with generalized granuloma annulare. Intern Med. 2019;58:1173–1177.</span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Fukai K, Ishii M, Kobayashi H, Someda Y, Hamada T, et al. Generalized granuloma annulare in a patient with temporal arteritis: are these conditions associated? Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990;15:70–2.</span></li>
<li class="p4"><span class="s1">Kluger N, Riviere S, Mura M, Guillot B, Girard C. Simultaneous occurrence of generalized granuloma annulare, anterior uveitis and giant cell arteritis: coincidental or not? Presse Med. 2012;41:548–9.</span></li>
<li class="p4"><span class="s1">Yanez S, Val-Bernal JF, Pena-Sagredo JL. Granuloma annulare and giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;3:S108–10.</span></li>
<li class="p5"><span class="s1">Günes ̧ P, Göktay F, Mansur AT, Köker F, Erfan G. Collagen-elastic tissue changes and vascular involvement in granuloma annulare: a review of 35 cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2009;36:838–44. </span></li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020/">Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
