<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Abstract Archives - Prem Nichani</title>
	<atom:link href="https://premnichani.ca/pubtype/abstract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubtype/abstract/</link>
	<description>PGY1 Ophthalmology Resident</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 03:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Investigation of inflammatory markers in patients with keratoconus</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/investigation-of-inflammatory-markers-in-patients-with-keratoconus/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=investigation-of-inflammatory-markers-in-patients-with-keratoconus</link>
					<comments>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/investigation-of-inflammatory-markers-in-patients-with-keratoconus/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 05:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Please contact Prem Nichani for a copy of the Abstract as it is neither officially accepted nor published by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/investigation-of-inflammatory-markers-in-patients-with-keratoconus/">Investigation of inflammatory markers in patients with keratoconus</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p>Please contact Prem Nichani for a copy of the Abstract as it is neither officially accepted nor published by a scholarly journal or academic conference.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/investigation-of-inflammatory-markers-in-patients-with-keratoconus/">Investigation of inflammatory markers in patients with keratoconus</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/investigation-of-inflammatory-markers-in-patients-with-keratoconus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of treat-and-extend to monthly and as-needed dosing of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-treat-extend-monthly-prn-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=retina-treat-extend-monthly-prn-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021</link>
					<comments>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-treat-extend-monthly-prn-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 04:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Note: Project inclusion amended to include nAMD eyes only to reduce potential bias and confounders. However, despite the exclusion of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-treat-extend-monthly-prn-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/">Comparison of treat-and-extend to monthly and as-needed dosing of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Note:</strong> Project inclusion amended to include nAMD eyes only to reduce potential bias and confounders. However, despite the exclusion of DME and CRVO + ME eyes, the conclusions or significance of any findings did not change.</p>
<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p><strong>Topic: </strong>Retina</p>
<p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are pivotal in the treatment armamentarium of neovascular retinal diseases. Treat-and-extend (T&amp;E) dosing aims to reduce cost barriers and the burden of frequent injections; however, the efficacy and safety of T&amp;E versus other dosing regimens remains unclear. This meta-analysis comprehensively consolidates the data from published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to answer this clinically relevant question.</p>
<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
<p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL to September 2020. English-language RCTs reporting on efficacy and/or safety outcomes of T&amp;E, bimonthly, monthly, and/or pro re nata (PRN) dosing regimens of anti-VEGF IVIs were included. Critical appraisal of trials for risk of bias and strength of evidence was performed using the Cochrane and GRADE guidelines, respectively. The primary outcome was improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), while secondary outcomes included changes in central subfield thickness (CSFT), mean number of injections, mean number of follow-up visits, and incidence of adverse events. All outcomes were collected at last follow-up. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model. If data were available, subgroup analyses were performed based on IVI agent and retinal disease.</p>
<p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 11 included RCTs, 1140 eyes were treated with a T&amp;E IVI dosing regimen, 866 with monthly, 123 with bimonthly, and 253 with PRN-dosed IVIs. One of 11 trials had a target follow-up of 6 months, five of 12 months, and five of 24 months (mean: 16.4 ± 7.0 months per eye). Across all trials, risk of bias was generally low-to-moderate. Mean change in BCVA and CSFT at last follow-up were non-significantly different between T&amp;E versus monthly (<em>P</em> = 0.23 and 0.22, respectively), bimonthly (<em>P</em> = 0.88 and 0.18, respectively), and PRN (<em>P</em> = 0.30 and 0.54, respectively) dosing regimens. T&amp;E conferred significantly fewer injections versus monthly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) but significantly higher injections versus PRN (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) dosing regimens by final follow-up. There was no significant difference in safety outcomes amongst comparators.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efficacy and safety differences are non-significant between T&amp;E, bimonthly, monthly, and PRN regimens. T&amp;E confers a statistically significant benefit of reduced injection burden relative to monthly dosing and reduced clinic visits relative to PRN. T&amp;E remains efficacious while potentially enhancing patient satisfaction, improving treatment adherence, stabilizing visual function, conferring cost savings, and aiding in capacity planning to treat neovascular retinal disease.</p>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1"><b>Nichani P</b></span></span><span class="s2">, Popovic MM, Dhoot AS, Pathak A, Muni RH, Kertes PJ. (2021). Comparison of treat-and-extend to monthly and as-needed dosing of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Canadian Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting &amp; Exhibition, Virtual Meeting (ePoster)</span><span class="s2">.</span> View presentation, references, and conflicts of interest <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mLwwXfBzUwuI5cUGatabrXAnEWpS_GyO/view">here</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-treat-extend-monthly-prn-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/">Comparison of treat-and-extend to monthly and as-needed dosing of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-treat-extend-monthly-prn-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021</link>
					<comments>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 04:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Please contact Prem Nichani for a copy of the Abstract as it is not officially accepted by nor published [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/">Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p>Please contact Prem Nichani for a copy of the Abstract as it is not officially accepted by nor published in a scholarly journal. Currently under review at <em>Ophthalmology Retina</em>.</p>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span class="s2"><span class="s2"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Popovic MM</span>, <strong>Nichani P,</strong> Dhoot AS, Pathak A, Muni RH, Kertes PJ. (2021). Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</span></span><span class="s2">. UofT Department of Ophthalmology &amp; Vision Sciences 62nd Research Day, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ePoster)</span><span class="s2">.</span> View presentation, references, and conflicts of interest here.</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/">Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis of 1697 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/namd-treat-and-extend-antivegf-meta-analysis-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, pneumatic retinopexy and combination procedures for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rrd-ppv-sb-pr-retina-2021/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rrd-ppv-sb-pr-retina-2021</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 22:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckle (SB), and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rrd-ppv-sb-pr-retina-2021/">Pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, pneumatic retinopexy and combination procedures for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckle (SB), and pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs).</p>
<p><strong>Setting:</strong> Meta-analysis.</p>
<p><strong>Methods:</strong> A systematic literature search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to July 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RRD management options were included. Outcomes were reported via risk ratios (RR) for categorical variables and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous parameters with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane criteria and a random-effects model was used for analysis. The visual recovery and incidence of complications were primary endpoints, while primary reattachment rate was a secondary outcome.</p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong> Sixteen RCTs and 2613 eyes were included. For PPV versus SB, early postoperative visual acuity favoured SB (weighted mean less than 1 month postoperatively: ~20/1000 for PPV versus ~20/160 for SB, p=0.03), but differences between groups were non-significant at other timepoints (e.g. 12+ months: ~20/60 for PPV and ~20/70 for SB). There was no difference between PPV and SB for primary reattachment (RR=1.05, 95%CI=[0.98,1.14], p=0.16). PPV was associated with a lower rate of choroidal detachment (RR=0.19, 95%CI=[0.06,0.60], p=0.004, NNT=11), hypotony (RR=0.08, 95%CI=[0.01,0.61], p=0.01, NNT=4) and strabismus/diplopia (RR=0.17, 95%CI=[0.03,0.96], p=0.04, NNT=25) relative to SB, while SB was associated with a lower incidence of iatrogenic breaks (RR=12.02, 95%CI=[2.31,62.55], p=0.003). Combination management was non-significantly different relative to PPV or SB alone for final CDVA, complications and reattachment rate. One trial comparing PR and PPV showed superior visual recovery and final acuity, less vertical metamorphopsia and reduced morbidity following PR.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> PPV is associated with a slower visual recovery and less morbidity but similar final visual acuity and primary reattachment rate relative to SB. Combination procedures did not improve primary reattachment rates or vision and were associated with comparable safety outcomes. Emerging data suggests that, in certain primary RRDs, PR should be a first-line intervention over PPV.</p>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1">Popovic MM</span></span><span class="s2">, Muni RH, </span><span class="s3"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">, Kertes PJ. (Oct 2020). Pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, pneumatic retinopexy and combination procedures for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis. European Society of Retina Specialists EURetina, Virtual Meeting (oral). <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1adYmH-EDiSa7FnWIjZOOVO8qkge0empx/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View presentation here</a>.</span></li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rrd-ppv-sb-pr-retina-2021/">Pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, pneumatic retinopexy and combination procedures for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rop-lpc-ivi-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rop-lpc-ivi-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract We investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rop-lpc-ivi-2020/">Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<section>
<div class="section-paragraph">
<div>
<p>We investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation (LPC) for retinopathy of prematurity. We performed a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL (2005–2019). Comparative studies reporting on ocular efficacy and/or safety outcomes after IVIs and LPC for retinopathy of prematurity were included. The primary outcome was the regression rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the likelihood of requiring additional treatment, visual and refractive outcomes, and complications. Overall, 777 publications were identified. Twenty-four articles were included, with 1,289 eyes receiving IVI and 2,412 eyes undergoing LPC. There was no significant difference in the regression rate between IVI and LPC (P = 0.68); however, eyes that underwent IVI were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of requiring additional treatment (risk ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.26, 3.73], P = 0.005) and longer time from treatment to retreatment or recurrence (weighted mean difference = 6.43 weeks, 95% CI = [2.36, 10.51], P = 0.002). Eyes receiving IVI required surgical intervention significantly less often (risk ratio = 0.45, 95% CI = [0.23, 0.89], P = 0.02). Astigmatism was significantly lower after IVI relative to LPC (weighted mean difference = −0.25 D, 95% CI = [−0.45, −0.06], P = 0.01), and there was a lower proportion of emmetropic eyes at last follow-up after LPC (risk ratio = 0.51, 95% CI = [0.27, 0.99], P = 0.05). There were no differences in visual and safety outcomes between IVI and LPC. LPC had a lower likelihood of requiring additional treatment, whereas IVIs were associated with a longer interval from treatment to retreatment or recurrence, reduced risk of surgical intervention and superior refractive outcomes. All other outcomes were comparable between IVIs and LPC.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords: </strong>retinopathy of prematurity; bevacizumab; ranibizumab; lasers; laser therapy</p>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1"><b>Nichani P</b></span></span><span class="s2">, Popovic MM, Muni RH, Mireskandari K, Tehrani NN, Kertes PJ. (2020). Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Las Vegas, NV, United States (ePoster). </span><span class="s3">Spotlighted by <i><a href="https://www.ophthalmologyadvisor.com/meetings/aao-2020/researchers-compare-laser-photocoagulation-injections-for-rop/">OphthalmologyAdvisor.com</a> </i>and<i><a href="https://www.practiceupdate.com/content/aao-2020-meta-analysis-compares-risksbenefits-of-laser-photocoagulation-versus-intravitreal-injections-for-retinopathy-of-prematurity/110009" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> PracticeUpdate.com</a>. </i></span><a href="https://aao.scientificposters.com/index.cfm?k=swsxpzuyfe">View ePoster with narration here</a>.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s3">Popovic MM</span></span><span class="s2">, </span><span class="s4"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">, Muni RH, Mireskandari K, Tehrani NN, Kertes PJ. (2020). Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes. European Society of Retina Specialists EURetina, Virtual Meeting (oral).</span> <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yaWZ0nvKBVBqvcRHwczR7XFjSywogaHR/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View presentation here</a>.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s3">Popovic MM</span></span><span class="s2">, </span><span class="s4"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">, Muni RH, Mireskandari K, Tehrani NN, Kertes PJ. (2020). Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes. UofT Department of Ophthalmology &amp; Vision Sciences 62nd Research Day, Toronto, ON (oral). </span><span class="s3"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Alumni Award for Best Resident Research Presentation</span>.</span> <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MCnxpSGUf3gv6Sk77KuOZ8YGjOWODHCE/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View presentation here</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/rop-lpc-ivi-2020/">Intravitreal injections versus laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis of 3701 eyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 03:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Topic: The role of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of ocular pain after intravitreal injections (IVIs) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020/">Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="abssec0010">
<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p id="abspara0010"><strong>Topic:</strong> The role of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of ocular pain after intravitreal injections (IVIs) has been explored. To provide clarity on the evidence for these agents, the present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0015">
<p id="abspara0015"><strong>Clinical Relevance:</strong> No standard of care regimen exists for the management of pain resulting from IVIs.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0020">
<p id="abspara0020"><strong>Methods:</strong> A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central from inception through July 2019. The RCTs that treated patients with a topical NSAID and assessed postprocedural pain were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane guidelines. For all analyses, weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Random effects models were used for all analyses. The primary analysis analyzed pain on a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale. Literature estimates were categorized into the following postprocedure time point groups: 1 hour or less, 1 to 24 hours (although data were available only at 6 hours), and 24 hours or more. A subgroup analysis stratified studies based on agent and preprocedure versus postprocedure administration.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0025">
<p id="abspara0025"><strong>Results:</strong> From 241 results, 9 RCTs and 598 eyes were included. A low to medium risk of bias was found across the included studies. The mean pain score on a 0-to-10 visual analog scale was significantly lower after topical NSAID administration relative to control at 1 hour or less after IVI (WMD, –1.01 units; 95% CI, –1.38 to –0.65; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), 6 hours after IVI (WMD, –2.17 units; 95% CI, –2.67 to –1.68; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; threshold met for clinical significance, defined as WMD &gt;1.2 units), and more than 24 hours after IVI (WMD, –0.75 units; 95% CI, –1.11 to –0.38; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). A greater effect size was seen with administration of NSAIDs before versus after IVI, as well as topical nepafenac relative to ketorolac or diclofenac.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0030">
<p id="abspara0030"><strong>Discussion:</strong> At 6 hours after the procedure, NSAIDs provide a clinically meaningful reduction in pain relative to a control group. The administration of NSAIDs before the procedure, specifically topical nepafenac, was associated with the greatest improvement in pain relative to the control group.</p>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
</div>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1">Popovic MM</span></span><span class="s2">, Muni RH, </span><span class="s3"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">, Kertes PJ. (Oct 2020). Topical non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis. European Society of Retina Specialists EURetina, Virtual Meeting (ePoster). <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rsl6oob2nTSQglJHh21bsD1przPvN9xy/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View ePoster here</a>.</span></li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/intravitreal-injections-nsaids-pain-2020/">Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain from intravitreal injections: A meta-analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 03:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Presentations Micieli JA, Nichani P. (2020). Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020/">Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span class="s1">Micieli JA</span><span class="s2">, </span><span class="s3"><b>Nichani P</b></span><span class="s2">. (2020). Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination. Canadian Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting &amp; Exhibition, Vancouver, BC (ePoster).</span></li>
</ol>
<h1>Notes</h1>
<p>COS2020 Reference List:</p>
<ol>
<li class="p1"><span class="s1">Hoffman GS. Giant cell arteritis. Ann Int Med. 2016;165:ITC65-80.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Giant-cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. N Engl J Med. 2014;37:50–7.</span></li>
<li class="p1"><span class="s1">Devaraj NK. Giant cell arteritis: where did we go wrong? Fortune J Rheumatol. 2019;1:12-4.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Weyand CM, Liao YJ, Goronzy JJ. The immunopathology of giant cell arteritis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012;32:259–265.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Helweg-Larsen J, Tarp B, Obel N, Baslund B. No evidence of parvovirus B19, Chlamydia pneumoniae or human herpes virus infection in temporal artery biopsies in patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2002;41:445–9.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Ing EB, Ing R, Liu X, Zhang A, Torun N, et al. Does herpes zoster predispose to giant cell arteritis: a geo-epidemiologic study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:113–118.</span></li>
<li class="p2"><span class="s1">Lotan I, Steiner I. Giant cell arteritis following varicella zoster vaccination. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:158–9.</span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Gilden D, White T, Khmeleva N, Heintzman A, Choe A, et al.</span> <span class="s1">Prevalence and distribution of VZV in temporal arteries of patients with giant cell arteritis. Neurology. 2015;85:1914–5.</span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Nagel MA, White T, Khmeleva N, Rempel A, Boyer PJ, et al. Analysis of varicella-zoster virus in temporal arteries biopsy positive and negative for giant cell arteritis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1281–7. </span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Perez C, Loza E, Tinture T. Giant cell arteritis after influenza vaccination. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2677. </span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N. “ASIA”—autoimmune/ inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. J Autoimmun. 2011;36:4–8. </span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Torisu Y, Horai Y, Michitsuji T, Kawahara C, Mori T, et al. Giant cell arteritis with generalized granuloma annulare. Intern Med. 2019;58:1173–1177.</span></li>
<li class="p3"><span class="s1">Fukai K, Ishii M, Kobayashi H, Someda Y, Hamada T, et al. Generalized granuloma annulare in a patient with temporal arteritis: are these conditions associated? Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990;15:70–2.</span></li>
<li class="p4"><span class="s1">Kluger N, Riviere S, Mura M, Guillot B, Girard C. Simultaneous occurrence of generalized granuloma annulare, anterior uveitis and giant cell arteritis: coincidental or not? Presse Med. 2012;41:548–9.</span></li>
<li class="p4"><span class="s1">Yanez S, Val-Bernal JF, Pena-Sagredo JL. Granuloma annulare and giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;3:S108–10.</span></li>
<li class="p5"><span class="s1">Günes ̧ P, Göktay F, Mansur AT, Köker F, Erfan G. Collagen-elastic tissue changes and vascular involvement in granuloma annulare: a review of 35 cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2009;36:838–44. </span></li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/gca-vzv-granuloma-vaccine-2020/">Granuloma annulare, scalp necrosis, and ischemic optic neuropathy from giant cell arteritis after varicella-zoster virus vaccination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retinal manifestations of idiopathic intracranial hypertension</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-iih-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=retina-iih-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 04:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Topic: This review presents a case series and systematic review to understand retinal changes in patients with idiopathic intracranial [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-iih-2020/">Retinal manifestations of idiopathic intracranial hypertension</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-serif">
<div id="abs0010" class="abstract author" lang="en">
<div id="abssec0010">
<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p id="abspara0010"><strong>Topic:</strong> This review presents a case series and systematic review to understand retinal changes in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) using fundus photography and OCT.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0015">
<p id="abspara0015"><strong>Clinical Relevance:</strong> IIH is a condition of raised intracranial pressure of unknown cause, usually observed in young, obese women. Ophthalmologic manifestations of IIH such as papilledema and abducens nerve palsy are well recognized, but less common retinal manifestations may occur.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0020">
<p id="abspara0020"><strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective institutional chart review (July 2018–March 2020) was performed on consecutive IIH patients. Fundus photographs were obtained followed by neuro-ophthalmology assessment to elicit clinical characteristics and for diagnosis. Patients who met the modified Dandy criteria were included. A systematic review of observational studies was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE to November 17, 2019, to supplement the case series data.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0025">
<p id="abspara0025"><strong>Results:</strong> Of 144 consecutive IIH clinical patients reviewed, 10 (6.9%) and over 182 patients from the literature showed retinal findings (% in case series, % in literature, respectively): subretinal fluid (SRF; 30,9), chorioretinal folds (30,68), macular exudate (ME; 20,5), choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM; 10,15), venous stasis retinopathy (VSR; 10,2), choroidal infarction (0,1), and branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO; 0,1). Eight clinical patients were women (80%), average age was 32.00 ± 13.99 years, body mass index was 40.63 ± 7.43 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, baseline visual acuity (VA) was 0.79 ± 0.30 in both eyes, and visual field (VF) results were –9.89 ± 11.52 dB in both eyes. Among clinical patients, 2 (1 with SRF, 1 with CNVM) had distinctive retina-related VF defects at presentation. Outer retinal abnormalities persisted on OCT in patients after resolution of SRF and papilledema. Surgical treatment (peritoneal shunt) was required for 2 patients (1 with VSR, 1 with SRF); others were treated with weight loss and acetazolamide alone. The patient with significant ME had hypertension that was treated.</p>
</div>
<div id="abssec0030">
<p id="abspara0030"><strong>Discussion:</strong> Significant retinal manifestations associated with IIH include CNVM, ME, SRF, VSR, chorioretinal folds, choroidal infarction, and BRAO. These may reduce VA or cause VF defects unrelated to papilledema, emphasizing the importance of a detailed dilated fundus examination. Consultation with a retina specialist is advised in patients with peripapillary CNVM.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="Keywords u-font-serif">
<div id="kwrds0010" class="keywords-section">
<div id="kwrd0010" class="keyword"><strong>Keywords:</strong> choroidal neovascular membrane; idiopathic intracranial hypertension; papilledema; retinopathy</div>
<div>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1"><b>Nichani P</b></span></span><span class="s2">, Micieli JA. (Jun 2020). Retinal manifestations of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Canadian Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting &amp; Exhibition, Virtual Meeting (oral). <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MIHGpu_msZf05kixXdNKQ245iflOZx5E/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View presentation here</a>.</span></li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/retina-iih-2020/">Retinal manifestations of idiopathic intracranial hypertension</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headache and bilateral optic disc edema as the initial manifestation of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/vogt-koyanagi-harada-vkh-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vogt-koyanagi-harada-vkh-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 04:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract A 31-year-old healthy Asian man presented with new headaches and blurred vision. He was found to have bilateral optic [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/vogt-koyanagi-harada-vkh-2020/">Headache and bilateral optic disc edema as the initial manifestation of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p>A 31-year-old healthy Asian man presented with new headaches and blurred vision. He was found to have bilateral optic disc edema (ODE) and peripapillary subretinal fluid and was initially investigated for causes of raised intracranial pressure. After referral to neuro-ophthalmology, he received a diagnosis of Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH) disease and his symptoms, ODE, and vision improved promptly with prednisone treatment. HLA typing was performed and returned positive for the HLA-DRB1*04 subtype. Although VKH disease usually presents with granulomatous uveitis or serous retinal detachments, ODE may manifest early in the disease course. Those with ODE in VKH disease are believed to be older and female, but this case demonstrates that these findings were also seen in a young man.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/vogt-koyanagi-harada-vkh-2020/">Headache and bilateral optic disc edema as the initial manifestation of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A selected review of studies</title>
		<link>https://premnichani.ca/pubs/migs-systematic-review-2020/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=migs-systematic-review-2020</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 04:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://premnichani.ca/?post_type=publications&#038;p=1146</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract Purpose: Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a less traumatic and potentially safer surgical method for patients with open-angle glaucoma. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/migs-systematic-review-2020/">Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A selected review of studies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Abstract</h1>
<p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a less traumatic and potentially safer surgical method for patients with open-angle glaucoma. However, it is a recent development for which the high-quality literature must be evaluated.</p>
<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p>
<p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of MIGS was conducted by searching Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL (2006 to 2019). The primary efficacy indicators were reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) and topical medication use postoperatively. Adverse event analysis was conducted; risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane, Newcastle-Ottawa, and World Glaucoma Association recommendations.</p>
<p><strong>Results: </strong>From 10076 articles identified, 3476 baseline eyes across 20 trials met all eligibility criteria and were included. The mean age was 69.5 ± 2.9, 53.7% were female, 77.4% were Caucasian, and 80% of included studies were randomized controlled trials. One study had last follow-up at less than one year, fifteen studies had follow-up extending 1-2 years, and four had longer than two years of follow-up. MIGS procedures or devices assessed included ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC), cyclophotocoagulation (CPC), CyPass<sup>®</sup> Micro-Stent, excimer laser trabeculotomy (ELT), Hydrus<sup>®</sup> Microstent, iStent<sup>® </sup>(1<sup>st</sup> generation), iStent<sup>®</sup> <em>inject</em> (2<sup>nd</sup> generaton), Kahook Dual Blade<sup>®</sup>, micropulse (MDLT), Trabectome<sup>®</sup>, and XEN<sup>®</sup> Gel Stent. A pattern of more significant IOP and medication reduction was observed in patients who received a MIGS device relative to control intervention. Across all studies at last follow-up, the mean IOP reduction was 8.0 ± 2.2 mmHg (n = 2067; range: 2.4–16.5 mmHg) vs. 7.1 ± 3.3 mmHg (n = 1234; range: 1.7–16 mmHg) and the mean reduction of topical medications was 1.4 ± 0.4 (n = 1864; range: -0.2–3 mmHg) vs. 1.0 ± 0.7 (n = 1234; range: -1–3 mmHg) in MIGS vs. control eyes, respectively. The 1<sup>st</sup> generation iStent had the most literature supporting its efficacy, followed by the Hydrus. Adverse events were more common among phaco-only eyes (42.3%) vs. standalone-MIGS eyes (21.9%); the rate was 45.0% for phaco-MIGS eyes. The most common adverse events following MIGS implantation included stent obstruction, inflammation, and repeat surgical intervention.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, there is some evidence to support the role of trabecular bypass and suprachoroidal MIGS devices in the treatment armamentarium for glaucoma. MIGS can effectively reduce IOP, decrease the number of topical medications taken, and minimize the number of complications associated with more invasive surgical devices, thus improving quality of life. We await the upcoming RCT evidence from other MIGS devices including the XEN<sup>®</sup> Gel Stent and InnFocus MicroShunt and hope through this iterative process to elucidate the comparative efficacy, safety, and future role of MIGS in the glaucoma surgical paradigm.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords: </strong>MIGS; ocular drainage implant; glaucoma surgery; filtration surgery; open-angle glaucoma; IOP reduction</p>
<h1>Presentations</h1>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li1"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1"><b>Nichani P</b></span></span><span class="s2">, Popovic M, Schlenker MB, Park J, Ahmed IIK. (2020). Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A selected review of studies. Canadian Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting &amp; Exhibition, Virtual Meeting (ePoster). </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s3">2</span><span class="s4"><sup>nd</sup></span><span class="s3"> Place</span><b> </b><span class="s3">Poster Award</span></span><span class="s2">.</span> <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fs2gTexZQfzdw7wXamW19nwZOmSygx8q/view">View presentation, references, and conflicts of interest here</a>.</li>
<li class="li1"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="s1"><b>Nichani P</b></span></span><span class="s2">, Popovic M, Schlenker MB, Park J, Ahmed IIK. (2020). Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A selected review of studies. UofT Department of Ophthalmology &amp; Vision Sciences 62nd Research Day, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (oral).</span> <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S1dZ98BHAROTBAYoxF0FQQOIjh7-kTW4/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">View presentation, references, and conflicts of interest here</a>.</li>
</ol>
<h1>Notes</h1>
<p><strong>Studies Included in Analysis:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Ab Interno Canaloplasty (ABiC)</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="s1">Gandolfi; </span><span class="s2"><i>J Ophthalmol</i></span><span class="s1">. 2016;2016:3410469 . </span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation (CPC)</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="s1">Aquino; </span><span class="s2"><i>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</i></span><span class="s1">. 2015;43(1):40-6. (</span><span class="s3">NCT00349414)</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">CyPass® Micro-Stent</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="s1">Vold; </span><span class="s2"><i>Ophthalmology</i></span><span class="s1">. 2016;123(10):2103-12. (</span><span class="s3">NCT01085357)</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Excimer Laser Trabeculectomy</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="s1">Babighian; </span><span class="s2"><i>Eye</i></span><span class="s1">. 2010;24(4):632-8. </span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hydrus® Microstent</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="s1">Samuelson; </span><span class="s2"><i>Ophthalmology</i></span><span class="s1">. 2019;126(1):29-37. (</span><span class="s3">NCT01539239)</span></li>
<li><span class="s1">Pfeiffer; </span><span class="s2"><i>Ophthalmology</i></span><span class="s1">. 2015;122(7):1283-93. (</span><span class="s3">NCT01818115)</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hydrus® Microstent vs. iStent®</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="s1">Ahmed; </span><span class="s2"><i>Ophthalmology</i></span><span class="s1">. 2019:1-10. (</span><span class="s3">NCT02023242</span><span class="s1">)</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">iStent® (G1) and iStent® Inject (G2)</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="s1">Samuelson; </span><span class="s2"><i>Ophthalmology</i></span><span class="s1">. 2019;126(6):811-21. (</span><span class="s3">NCT00323284)</span></li>
<li><span class="s1">Katz; </span><span class="s2"><i>Clin Ophthalmol</i></span><span class="s1">. 2018;12:255-62. (</span><span class="s3">NCT01517477)</span></li>
<li><span class="s1">Vold; </span><span class="s2"><i>Ophthalmol Ther</i></span><span class="s1">. 2016;5(2):161-72. (</span><span class="s3">NCT01443988)</span></li>
<li><span class="s1">Fea;</span> <span class="s2"><i>Clin Ophthalmol</i></span><span class="s1">. 2014;8:875-82.</span></li>
<li><span class="s1">Samuelson; </span><span class="s2"><i>Ophthalmology</i></span><span class="s1">. 2011;118(3):459-67. (</span><span class="s3">NCT00323284)</span></li>
<li><span class="s1">Fernández-Barrientos; </span><span class="s2"><i>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</i></span><span class="s1">. 2010;51(7):3327-32. (</span><span class="s3">NCT00326066)</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kahook Dual Blade® (KDB)</span>
<ul>
<li>Le; <span class="s2"><i>Adv Ther</i></span><span class="s1">. 2019;36(9):2515-27.</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Micropulse Diode Laser Trabeculoplasty (MDLT)</span>
<ul>
<li>Detry-Morel; <em>Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol</em>. 2008;(308):21-8.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Trabectome®</span>
<ul>
<li>Sato; <em>BMJ Open Ophthalmol</em>. 2018;3(1):1-7. (UMIN000021170)</li>
<li>Ting; <em>Can J Ophthalmol</em>. 2018;53(6):588-94. (NCT00901108)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">XEN® Gel Stent</span>
<ul>
<li>Schlenker; <em>Ophthalmology</em>. 2017;124(11):1579-88.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://premnichani.ca/pubs/migs-systematic-review-2020/">Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: A selected review of studies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://premnichani.ca">Prem Nichani</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
